![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1800 (Sir) HUMPHRY DAVY (1778 - 1829) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Davy provides us with the most brilliant light yet used in projection, the electric (carbon) arc lamp. The work is recorded in Nicholson's Journal of 1800 as well as the lectures of Silvanus Thompson (Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, October 1895, On the Arc Light). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1801-1802 PAUL M. PHILIPSTHAL ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Either in 1801 0r 1802, Philipsthal gave Robertson’s Fantasmagorie the English spelling Phantasmagoria and began presenting shows in London at the Lyceum Theatre. Philipsthal was a German showman and was primarily responsible for the invention of ‘dissolving views’, however Childe advanced it greatly. On seeing one of Philipsthal's performances at the Lyceum, Sir Humphry Davy wrote; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“The small theatre of exhibition was lighted only by one hanging lamp, the flame of which was drawn up into an opaque chimney or shade when the performance began. In this 'darkness visible' the curtain rose and displayed a cave with skeletons and other terrific figures in relief upon its walls. The flickering light was then drawn up beneath its shroud, and the spectators in total darkness found themselves in the middle of thunder and lightning. A thin transparent screen had, unknown to the spectators, been let down after the disappearance of the light, and upon it the flashes of lightning and all the subsequent appearances were represented. This screen being half-way between the spectators and the cave which was first shown, and being itself invisible, prevented the observers from having any idea of the real distance of the figures, and gave them the entire character of aerial pictures. The thunder and lightning were followed by the figures of ghosts, skeletons, and known individuals, whose eyes and mouth were made to move by the shifting of combined sliders. After the first figure had been exhibited for a short time, it began to grow less and less, as if removed to a great distance, and at last vanished in a small cloud of light. Out of this same cloud the germ of another figure began to appear, and gradually larger and larger, and approached the spectators till it attained its perfect development. In this manner, the head of Dr. Franklin was transformed into a skull; figures which retired with the freshness of life came back in the form of skeletons, and the retiring skeletons returned in the drapery of flesh and blood. The exhibition of these transmutations was followed by spectres, skeletons, and terrific figures, which, instead of vanishing as before, suddenly advanced upon the spectators, becoming larger as they approached them, and finally vanished by appearing to sink into the ground. The effect of this part of the exhibition was naturally the most impressive. The spectators were not only surprised but agitated, and many of them were of the opinion that they could have touched the figures.” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-
Davy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1802 ROBERT HARRUP ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Harrup substantiated the previous experiments of C. W. Scheele in discovering that heat had no effect on silver compounds with respect to darkening. Harrup’s own experiments on mercury salts under several environments proved again that light was the cause. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1802 THOMAS WEDGEWOOD (WEDGWOOD) (1771 - 1805) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wedgewood published a process he calls ‘sun-printing’. He had duplicated previous work by Scheele and Schulze. Wedgewood placed sensitized papers out under the sun but could not keep the sheet from going completely black. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19TH CENTURY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Throughout the whole of the 19th century, room camera obscuras became more popular and were being built across Europe and Britain. Many observatories were reconstructed which included telescopes as well. Although not as frequent across the landscape as our movie theatres of today are, they flourished as a form of entertainment to the traveler as well as the locals. Seaside resorts and hilltop locales were popular venues. For a detailed study of today's existing room camera obscuras, see John Hammond’s The Camera Obscura, A Chronicle, 19th Century section, (Adam Hilger Ltd., Bristol, 1981). A fine online collection of camera obscura rooms may be seen at the Magic Mirror of Life. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In the early 1800’s, the portable camera obscura began to look more and more as the camera of today. By the 1830’s, the camera obscura was ready and waiting for a medium to capture its images and keep them. It had provided all it could in the form of a curiosity, and after the discovery of fixed-image processes, the camera obscura went on to provide a more serious, yet breathtaking form of entertainment never previously imagined. As well, the camera obscura’s cousin, the magic lantern had a illustrious career of it’s own. Read on and learn of the diorama, panorama, dissolving views and the infamous Phantasmagoria. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1803 PAUL M. PHILIPSTHAL ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philipstal provided an evening or two of enjoyment with his version of the Phantasmagoria as reported by Brewster. The apparitions were apparently produced within a small room such as an apartment and included music! At least a century before Kircher’s show (which would place it at approximately 1540), the history of CELLINI provides us with a report on a Phantasmagoric-type show presented at the Coliseum, documented by Roscoe in his ‘Life Of Benvenuto Cellini’. Brewster also, has quoted this event. Philipstal’s lantern shows were known to have resided upon tracks or rails. Phantasmagoric visions were seen upon a translucent sheet or similar material as opposed to the dissolving view were an opaque background was required. Philipsthal not only introduced the Phantasmagoria into England, he also invented the idea of the Dissolving View. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1807 JAMES THAYER ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thayer was an American who purchased a Panorama in Paris and proceeded to build two enormous rotundas (of 17 m/56 ft diameter) on the boulevard Montmartre. Their location is remembered by the naming of a lane way as Passage des Panoramas. Two of his Panoramas were called 'A View of Paris' and 'The Evacuation of Toulon by the British in 1793'. Thayer commissioned the French artist Pierre Prevost to paint for a new location, with enormous proportions. It was located between the rue Neuve-Saint-Augustin and the boulevard des Capucines with measurements in excess of 93 feet (radius) and exhibits of 330 feet (diameter) by 48 feet (high). The structure could seat 150 per show and patrons sat no closer than 36 feet from the screen. Thayer's paintings were done by Pierre Prévost and Charles Bouton to name two. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1815 DAVID BREWSTER (1781 - 1868) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brewster was a Scottish inventor and scientist who gave the world the Kaleidoscope, a toy that would bring millions around the world a visually pleasing spectacle of twisting and turning colours and shapes. In 1819 he wrote and published a Treatise on the Kaleidoscope. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1816 JOSEPH NICEPHORE NIEPCE (1765 - 1833) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Niépce documents his belief that “making drawings by means of light” is a real possibility. He builds a camera obscura with a microscope lens and produced a picture that he took using muriate of silver, creating a negative image on semi-transparent paper (described and included in a letter written to his brother Claude dated 28 May 1816). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the letter, Niépce writes . . . "As there is less light inside the box the image becomes clearer and its outlines as well as the dark and light patches are more sharply defined. You can see this if you look at the roof of the pigeon house, the angles of its walls, the casement window of which the lattices are visible, the glass even seeming transparent in some places. In short, the paper retains an exact imprint of the coloured image, and if everything cannot be seen distinctly is because the image represented here being very small, this object appears as it would if seen from very far away. The pigeon house being depicted in reverse, the barn, or rather its roof, is on the left instead of on the right. That white mass to the right of the pigeon house above the fence, which is not very clear but just as it appears on the reflected image, is the de Beurré-blanc pear tree, which is much further away and that spot on the upper part of the tree is a patch of light visible between the branches. The shadow on the right side indicates the roof of the bake house which appears lower than it should, because the boxes (camera obscura) are placed about 5 feet from the ground of the room. Finally, my dear friend, those little white streaks over the barn are branches of the trees in the orchard of which one catches a glimpse and which are reflected on the "retina". The effect would be more striking if, as I have told you, or as I don't need to tell you, the order of the dark and light parts could be reversed." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J.
E. Purkyne |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1819 CHARLES CHEVALIER (1804 - 1859) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In order to alleviate achromatism, Chevalier began work on replacing the lens and mirror of the camera with a prism containing lens surfaces. His work will be finished in 1823 with his ‘meniscus prism’. Just seven years before the first permanent photograph was taken, Niépce ordered a meniscus prism from Chevalier. Niépce was not pleased in his experiments with it and sent it back to Chevalier. Chevalier's prism was constructed for use in the camera obscura, to be used in drawings and engravings. Gernsheim has suggested that Niépce used the prism in the taking of the photograph at Le Gras. This is unlikely. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1821 JEAN-BAPTISTE BIOT (1774 - 1862) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pictures up to twenty times life size were possible with a camera obscura Megascope according to Biot. He illustrated such with description suggesting that a meniscus lens could further advance the image. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1822 LOUIS JACQUES MANDE DAGUERRE (1787 - 1851) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daguerre opens the first Diorama in rue Sanson, Paris. Daguerre provided scenes of The Interior of Trinity Chapel (painted by Charles Bouton), along with the Valley of Unterwalden and Canterbury Cathedral (Daguerre). The scenes consisted of elaborate landscapes and places well known to the public. The large scale paintings on canvas were huge, measuring 14 metres by 22 metres. These translucent paintings were lit from behind and could be made brighter or less, according to the mood or atmosphere the operator wanted. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A review of the
event is as follows; "The visitors, after passing through a gloomy anteroom, were ushered into a circular chamber, apparently quite dark. One or two small shrouded lamps placed on the floor served dimly to light the way to a few descending steps and the voice of an invisible guide gave directions to walk forward. The eye soon became sufficiently accustomed to the darkness to distinguish the objects around and to perceive that there were several persons seated on benches opposite an open space resembling a large window. Through the window was seen the interior of Canterbury Cathedral undergoing partial repair with the figures of two or three workmen resting from their labours. The pillars, the arches, the stone floor and steps, stained with damp, and the planks of wood strewn on the ground, all seemed to stand out in bold relief, so solidly as not to admit a doubt of their substantiality, whilst the floor extended to the distant pillars, temptingly inviting the tread of exploring footsteps. Few could be persuaded that what they saw was a mere painting on a flat surface. The impression was strengthened by perceiving the light and shadows change, as if clouds were passing over the sun, the rays of which occasionally shone through the painted windows, casting coloured shadows on the floor. Then shortly the lightness would disappear and the former gloom again obscure the objects that had been momentarily illumined. The illusion was rendered more perfect by the sensitive condition of the eye in the darkness of the surrounding chamber." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daguerre was a larger-than-life painter who seriously desired the real thing in his art and through the Diorama he could achieve this effect by actually bringing the scene to the theatre (almost). Daguerre began his early working years as an architect, and soon after became an assistant stage designer for a theatre. Daguerre was a gifted illusionist in terms of his ability to design sets, which dazzled audiences. These designs he would later coin as a ‘Diorama’. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeremiah
Gurney |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1823 CHARLES CHEVALIER (1804 - 1859) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chevalier presents his ‘meniscus prism’ in the camera obscura instead of lenses and mirrors. In doing this, he avoided the aberration created through curved lenses (lost focus in the centre or fringe of the screen on a plane screen) known as achromatism. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1824 GEORGE BIRCKBECK (1776 - 1841) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This Englishman used the calcium lights of Gurney in his magic lantern presentations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1824 PETER MARK ROGET (1779 - 1869) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A london physician, Roget had dabbled in the sciences, designing a logarithmic slide scale and becoming well learned in the study of mass water systems. Roget was secretary of the Royal Society and later lectured on perception, prior to his presentation to the society of his ‘Persistence of Vision With Regard To Moving Objects’. He provided an early definition of the phenomenon of the backwards wheel in forward motion, touching upon persistence of vision. Roget is better known of course for his thesaurus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1825 JOHN AYRTON PARIS (1785 - 1856) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A year before Fitton's paper toy, Paris began manufacturing what he called a Thaumatrope. It is a simple illusionary toy meant to imitate motion. It consists of a circular disk made of paper, which has an image on each side. When twirled by connected string, the images combine to give an animated effect. The bird-in-a-cage was a popular theme. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1825 WILLIAM RITCHIE ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ritchie used a gas powered lamp for projection of pre-Phantasmagoria in the magic lantern. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1826 PHILIP CARPENTER ( - d. 1833) & WILLIAM WESTLEY ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philip Carpenter manufactured top-quality magic lanterns and slides. Operating in London England, he designed a mass-production process of creating copper-plated lanternslides. His sister Mary Carpenter continued the business upon his death along with William Westley. From 1835 the company was known as Carpenter & Westley. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1826 THOMAS DRUMMOND (1797 - 1840) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drummond was born in Edinburgh Scotland and invented the signal light which produced lime light through the use of calcium oxide. Drummond found that lime was far more brilliant than an Argand lamp and that in a concave mirror the rays of light also were more concentrated at the focal point. He further found that the rays of light were reflected in close parallel rays and not near the focus where few are found as is found with Argand light. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1826 LOUIS JACQUES MANDE DAGUERRE (1787 - 1851) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daguerre hears of the work of Niepce, and within three years will have agreed to a partnership with him for the purposes of advancing the photographic process. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1826 ROBERT BARKER ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This Scot is considered to be the pre-inventor of the Panorama (or Cyclorama). The Panorama took the form of a circular rotunda where the audience sat in the centre, viewing the larger-than-life scenes that circled them. Typically, the ceiling would be covered for effect, partly to keep eyes from wandering and distractions. Consider today's Planetarium. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1827 JOSEPH NICEPHORE NIEPCE (1765 - 1833) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Niépce presented a paper to the Royal Society in London including with it, several of his Heliographs on metals and glass. Because his process was kept from the work, he was refused the privilege of presenting. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1827 BASIL HALL (1788 - 1844) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Born in Edinburgh Scotland, Hall wrote a book entitled ‘Forty Etchings Made With The Camera Lucida In North America’ in which he sustained the instrument’s worth to the traveler, liberating him from “The Triple Misery Of Perspective, Proportion And Form”. The publication of course, includes forty etchings. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1827 (SIR) CHARLES WHEATSTONE (1802 - 1875) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Invents the Kaleidophone which provided a combination of Kaleidoscope effects with primitive musical sounds. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1828 JOSEPH ANTOINE FERDINAND PLATEAU (1801 - 1883) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plateau had been investigating persistence of vision at the University of Ghent, Belgium and in 1829 published his experiments. In 1836 he will establish the law of the ‘stroboscopic effect’. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1828 JAMES M. WATTLES ( - ) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A youth, Wattles attempts
to retain an image on plain paper that was soaked in potash and placed
within his camera obscura. His unsuccessful attempt was ridiculed by many
as simple "moonshine" thoughts. Henry
Snelling in 1849 wrote 'The History and Practice of the Art of
Photography' and in it made the false claime that Wattles was
the rightful inventor of photography. Snelling said Wattles invented photography
in 1828 but was reticent about announcing his discovery due to possible
"ridicule". Wattles referred to photographs as a
"Solar picture drawing".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AUTHOR'S NOTE: We believe it important to note that up until the work of Marey and Muybridge (1872), pictures used for the purpose of motion recreation, where all drawings or photographic-type transparencies of posed motion. Even though Plateau suggested using photographs in their place in 1848, it took another 24 years before happening. Muybridge especially with his work in stop-action series photography, ultimately paved the way for photographs to finally be used (over 50 years after their discovery) in the formation of moving pictures. Then, subjects did not have to be still or even pose as still. They could move freely and be captured as moving, and then presented as if captured that way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||